Skip to Main Content

LS 420 Senior Seminar: Evaluating Sources

Overview

Faculty often tell students to use Scholarly rather than Popular articles for research and papers. Scholarly articles are also called peer reviewed or refereed or academic articles and are found in journals, not magazines or newspapers.  

How can you tell the difference between a scholarly and a popular or trade magazine?  Check out the anatomy of a scholarly article box below o help you identify the key elements of a scholarly article.

There are some articles which don’t fall clearly into any one category. You will need to use your judgment—and the clues from this Guide—to determine which kind of publication or article you are dealing with.

ACCORD Rubric for evaluating any source regardless of type

 

Download PDF for accessible image

 

Reminder: The ACCORD model is designed to help you make informed decisions about what sources to include in your academic work.  Not every source has to PASS every criteria to be included in your work. For example, you might not be able to determine the Oversight of a website but you are confident in the Agenda, Credentials and Citations criteria so you decide to use it as a source.  You as the researcher have to make those decisions based on weighing all of the criteria against each other!

Purdue OWL: Evaluating Sources of Information

Evaluating Blogs

Internet marketing strategist and blogger Steven Streight came up with some basic guidelines that all professional blogs should meet:
 
  • Tolerance for opposing viewpoints (not deleting comments the author disagrees with)
  • Blog author responds in a timely manner to comments and posts (in a non-summarizing way)
  • Professional use of visual elements
  • Free from sleazy sponsored links and spam comment posts
  • Free of spelling and grammar errors

Evaluating Statistics

Things to keep in mind when figuring out if your info is credible:

  • Who collected the data?
    • Do they have an interest in the results that might indicate bias?
  • How recently was the data published?
  • Does the sample size represent a fair population?
  • Has the data been "re-packaged"?
    • For example, government data published by a private source might be incomplete or biased in its "re-packaging".
  • Is the data from a primary source?
    • If not, is it properly cited (referenced) to easily locate the original, primary source?
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.